At 01:59 PM 7/6/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > At 12:51 PM 7/6/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > >Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
> > >
> > > > (eg. I solemnly swear to never use symbolic
> > > > references, count on specific op patterns, or
> > > > use any number large enough to require
> > > > bignums.)
>
>Would these promises be better stated as in-code pragmata instead
>of compiler switches?
Lexically scoped optimization hints seem like rather a tricky thing to deal
with.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
