Re: Modules, Versioning, and Beyond

[Dave Mitchell]

Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This came up on comp.lang.perl.misc once, and Ilya Z. then wrote, IIRC,
> that there's no reason why the DLL (if I may call it this way) should
> have a name identical to the module name. His example was that on his
> port, for OS/2, he added a (machine generated) versioning string.
> 
> I think this is a good time to generalise that practice.

This will help with with DLL/.so's that are compiled from XS, but doesn't
solve the problem of 3rd-party libraries.

Dave M