At 01:53 PM 9/20/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:38:57PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Nope. Internal I/O, at least as the interpreter will see it is async. You
> > can build sync from async, it's a big pain to build async from sync.
> > Doesn't mean we actually get asynchrony, just that we can.
>
>For clarification: do you mean async I/O, or non-blocking I/O?
Async. When the interpreter issues a read, for example, it won't assume the
read completes immediately.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk