>>"skip" was uncomfortable when I read it (I at first took it to mean >>"skip over the following" rather than "skip to the following"), but >>I find "nobreak" also a bit strange. How about "proceed"? > > If we mean "fall-through", why invent a new term? Why not use the > intent: C<fall_through>?
Wow, keyword with underscore. I like "proceed" much better. Tomas.
