At 22:02 on 02/15/2002 PST, "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # +++ misc.c 16 Feb 2002 05:36:46 -0000 > It's not indenting the nested switch() statements the same as their > matched break;s. Hrm. It _should_ be indented OK.. not sure what happened there- can whoever applies the patch make sure that comes out ok and tweak if necessary? > # +++ lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CPrederef.pm 16 Feb 2002 05:36:50 -0000 > I think there's an INLINE macro defined somewhere in the core that is > 'inline' when we're on C++ and null otherwise. It's just in the rx stuff right now, but once this patch is installed I can go back and generalize that. It's getting hard for me to keep track of my changes right now so i'd prefer to get those in first. --Josh
