Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 11:47 PM -0700 4/13/02, Robert Spier wrote: >> Looks like we've got a slew of gcc3 issues (which don't show up on the >> tinderboxes, cause nobody's running a gcc3 box.) > What sub-version of GCC 3?
3.0.4 (running on a relatively stock Pentium2 / RH7.2 system.) This came out of a weird conversation on IRC where someone who was using gcc3 as their default compiler was having trouble... so I tried it. -R
