At 8:55 PM +0200 5/23/02, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > Theoretically this shouldn't be done,
>In practice you can't assume something like that (at least when using
>callee-save calling convention), or do I miss the point?
Nope, you didn't miss the point. The GC assumes that the register
frames might be empty, but not that the individual registers pushed
on the stack might be empty. Ramification of callee save I'd not
thought about.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
