On 28 Oct 2002 at 16:42, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 4:39 PM -0500 10/28/02, brian wheeler wrote: > >On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:25, Michael Lazzaro wrote: > > > >> explicit radix specifications for integers: > >> 0123 - decimal > >> 2:0110 - binary [also b:0110?] > >> 8:123 - octal [also o:123?] > >> 16:123 - hex [also h:123?] > >> 256:192.168.1.0 - base 256 > >> (...etc...) > >> > > > >I've got to admit that I've not paid alot of attention to this > >thread...but does that mean 0x1234 and 01234 (octal) go away or is > >this an omission? > > While we're at it, maybe we can add in 0rMCM to allow roman numerals > too... --
What about specifying endiannes also, or would that be too low-level to even consider? Currently I don't have any examples for where it might even be used... -- Markus Laire 'malaire' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
