Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would remove the rxstack, but I didn't want to break the closest > thing we have to a regex engine until I or someone else managed to > release a different working implementation. The particular technique > of using a single stack tied directly the interpreter is an > evolutionary dead end, however. Good for a proof of concept, but > that's it.
Yep. Lets keep it, until the real rx engine is in. leo
