On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Thomas Vesper wrote: > Michal Wallace wrote: > > Out of curiosity, why does ~ map to both > > unary bitwise-not and binary bitwise-xor > > in imcc? > > > > I was expecting xor to be ^ and ^^ > > See Apocalypse 3 for this. > ^ was reclaimed for hyperoperators. > Binary ~ was chosen as replacement since bitwise-not is already somehow > like bitwise xor with only one operand. > And so ~~ became logical xor.
Aha. I remember that now. Thanks. :) Sincerely, Michal J Wallace Sabren Enterprises, Inc. ------------------------------------- contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/ my site: http://www.withoutane.com/ --------------------------------------
