Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a new test case for t/pmc/sub.t > ######## > output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "set_eh - throw - clear_eh"); > print "start\n" > newsub P20, .Exception_Handler, _handler > set_eh P20 > new P30, .Exception > throw P30 > print "not reached\n" > end > _handler: > clear_eh > print "caught it\n" > end > CODE > start > caught it > OUTPUT > ######### [ panic ] > I don't know if my test is right or not, but I'm > expecting the exception handler to still be around > after the exception is caught. No, the exception object isn't around anymore in the handler, so you don't C<clear_eh> there. This could of course be just my wrong implementation. > I don't care if it goes away after the exception is > caught, but I need a way to clear the exception > handler after I get out of the try/except or > try/finally block... Otherwise later exceptions > will bring me backward in the code. :/ Can you insert C<clear_eh> before you fall through to except/finally? > Sincerely, > > Michal J Wallace leo
