On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Steve Purkis wrote:
> On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 06:11  pm, Steve Fink wrote:
> 
> > On Sep-20, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:02:34AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can't just do that, though, because PAUSE won't accept submissions
> >>> with duplicate filenames.
> >>>
> >>> So would people prefer 0.0.11.2 or 0.0.12? (0.0.12 would improve the
> >>> average spacing between releases!)
> >>
> >> Or bribe^Wcontact Andreas directly
> >
> > Yep, I'm trying that route too.
> 
> If you're suggesting replacing the current version on CPAN it might not 
> be the best idea considering people have probably downloaded it 
> already.  Best thing would be to bump up the version number, I'd go for 
> 0.0.12..  but then - what's it's name gonna be? ;-)

Mmm. Good point.
But part of me actually prefer the more crazy sounding 0.0.11.2, given that
it's effectively the same release.

Then again, they're only numbers, and it's not like they are a finite
resource.

Nicholas Clark

Reply via email to