-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Moin,
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 21:41, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > If I could just change "Test;" to "Test::More;" without hundreds of
> > warnings springing on me I know I would convert the test scripts and
> > then change them step by step over to the new code (or not change them
> > at all, because don't change working code..)
>
> If you don't mind adding a
>
> use MyModule::OKSwapper;
Yup, I thought about this. But beeing lazy (and stupid) I thought I had
discovered a bug in Test::More.
I still think a big warning should be added to Test::More beeing _not_ a
drop-in replacement to Test. After all,
use Test::More;
ok ($foo, 'nice');
does not test that $foo eq 'nice', which Test; does... caveat empor
Cheers,
Tels
PS: Thanx for your suggestion, but what exactly does this do:
sub ok
{
@_ = 1;
goto &Test::More::ok;
}
Pass a single (1), or only the first argument? *puzzled*
- --
Signed on Tue Feb 3 21:44:03 2004 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"Ivonna Humpalot"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
iQEVAwUBQCAIvXcLPEOTuEwVAQHFJQf+M9Ksrteg5WMbxZ91yPf9ZM+qnVLo6AqW
4HYnNRGFzAEw/PuAq8yqpSbblKTrwOxLRYZJ6pDimNHiFtf+rKZ8Gw18uaN7O0uU
wc10cv+gAvib9+2voc9Jg5YEs7+Ps4K6Nn4P2pVr2g26Y3xa1rqXWSWN7DnrWdxd
wj/XiQENEJNYB6TGzvTAL8x4O3aZ/CtRXfo1Bc78pvr1r0JIKs5VQlhLLedFnuU8
9OO2A7w5stEZ1BX5Pzc3gW4Bb90FegYDdJ7rYlaSAvXkBLbR5BmlrWr9O+kPPp2A
/aYbU1DuDAPQkfqijl0bRWJnUvdxg1CGRMu6iR+Kmv8ZKgU8b9J9YQ==
=rCe9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
