Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:22 PM +0200 4/13/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>Marcus Thiesen wrote: >>>. Seems as if something doesn't get cleaned up in icu with a parrot >>>realclean. >> >>Yep. I've removed cleaning icu from clean/realclean[1].
> I think we need to put that back for a bit, I did list two alternatives. The "normal" way of changes doesn't include changes to ICU source (and honestly shouldn't). Currently building is still a bit in flux, which does mandate a "make icu.clean". And there is of course already a new ICU version on *their* website, but we still try to get/keep 2.6 running. I'm still not sure that this lib should be part of *our* tree ... > ... but with this: >>[1] If anyone puts that in again he might also send a lot faster PC >>to me (and possibly other developers ;) > We're also likely going to be well-off if we get configure to detect > a system ICU install and use that instead. There are severals issues: First one is MANIFEST and CVS and patches. Config steps should be simple. But - of course - I'd appreciate this alternative as already layed out. leo
