are you going to predict any new operators based on missing boxes as mendeleev did? :)
Funny you should ask! It is clear that there is a missing "list concatenate" operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that is already taken by "smart match". On the other hand, perhaps comma fills this role - though I couldn't find my way through the discussion on comma to know where it now stands.
I was going to predict a quasi-operator for an alternate form of qw/.../, but seems I just missed the thread where «...» was introduced for that purpose. It will be corrected in the next version of the chart.
- Mark
Mark Lentczner http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
