Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I right in thinking that with trace of 1, it's perfectly acceptable for > the core to print this DOD message, and therefore that the test is wrong > in its expectations?
Yep. > ... ie it's regexp of expected output needs changing to > accept the "DOD" line Rather not. The test is just checking if the runloop opcode is working. When in JIT, a restart with the slow core is done ... The DOD message is a side-effect of all possible internals and it's there or not, or sooner or later depending on the phase of moon and pluto. Just disabling DOD is ok for this test. leo
