Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Copying 640 bytes once, or 640 bytes * 2 * nr of calls? What is >>inefficient?
> This *only* makes a difference for vtable functions written in > bytecode. For normal code we're already copying the frames in and out > when we make a call and there's no way around that. Did you even read my proposal? It works[1] for *all* subroutines. I'm not talking about calls from within C. leo [1] unless proven wrong.
