All~ I personally thing that the suggestion of providing a base namespace PMC and letting each language create their own if they want overrides is a really nice idea. I think the base one should have the maximum number of distinct subspaces with special functions to access them (i.e. function, variable, method, ...) and then if a target language doesn't want them all it can simply have all of them look in the same place, check type, and return it.
Matt On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:57:13 -0400, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Dan Sugalski: > > I'm fine with mashing functions and variables into a single big mass... > > Me too (FWIW). And I think it'll work. > > PS: I've got the Glob Stick where I can reach it. > -- > Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "I don't really think it is a question of bright people and dumb > people, but rather people who can see the game they're playing and > those who can't." -- Joe Cosby > -- "Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory." -???
