Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > I'd like to initiate a debate here about parrot's version. I really find > that a project that moves on so quickly such as parrot does should > change its version number more often.
Yep, you are right. > I was suggesting on irc to do as Nicholas is doing with Perl 5.8.x: a > new revision every 3 months. That was/is the plan anyway. During summer the pie-thon hack session interfered. Sorry for that. While a lot got implemented, more is just incomplete or even wrongly done. I'd rather had more cleanup before doing a release. OTOH too much time has already gone since the last release. So, here's the plan: * namespace and calling convention changes are postponed after 0.1.1 * other major changes to the core ditto * document updates, bug fixes, cleanup patches are very welcome * patches to PLATFORMS reflecting the current build/test state wanted too * especially WRT the state of building with our or system ICU * 0.1.1 will be released RSN that is either at the end of this week or the next, depending mainly on the last two items above. > Jerome leo
