On Oct-05, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > The following patch makes compilation both slightly quieter and also > slightly more informative. > > Or, with less "spin", it fixes bad advice I gave previously. Specifically, > I had previously noted that it's generally helpful if the Makefile prints > out the commands it is trying to execute so that it's easier to track down > problems when they fail. When I suggested that the '@' be removed from > the .pbc.imc rule, I suggested at the same time that the '@' also be > removed from the compilation step above it. > > Alas, that wasn't quite the right place to do it. What's ultimately of > interest is the command that actually gets called. Accordingly, this > patch puts the '@' back in front of the invocation > of tools/dev/cc_flags.pl, but changes the print statement in > tools/dev/cc_flags.pl to show the actual compilation command being issued. > > Again, I have found that information to be useful on numerous > occasions. Also, considering how noisy the whole ICU build is, I > think the extra clutter for parrot's sources is not a significant > additional burden.
Makes sense to me. Applied, thanks. Tell me again why Andy doesn't have commit privs yet?