Dan Sugalski wrote:
What part of "This stuff isn't going to change" hasn't been clear?
Your sentence below answering Matt's question about dismissing my arguments lightly?
There is quite a difference between "not change. Period" and "not change now".
At 2:15 PM -0500 11/8/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
> Dan~ > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:45:08 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The calling conventions and code surrounding them will *not* change >> now. When all the sub stuff, and the things that depend on it, are >> fully specified and implemented... *then* we can consider changes. >> Until then, things stand the way they are. > > > I missunderstood. I though you were saying that what is currently in > is final and will *never* be changed. Thanks for the clarification.
Ah, OK. I was unclear, then. Sorry for the confusion.
--------- leo
