Jerome Quelin writes: > On 04/11/22 07:14 -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match. > > They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with > > a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change. > > Well, since we're nitpicking conventions and consistency, what about: > PGE::compile > and PGE::match (instead of Match) >
Probably because PGE::compile is a sub and PGE::Match is a class :-) Luke
