On Tue 21 Dec 2004 18:32, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > > I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody > > > using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it? > > > > I am converting my old tests directly to Test::More (Test::legacy wasn't > > available before so :) > > > > Currently I do not plan to do this - the old tests either work (never fix > > what > > is working) or they don't (seldom), at which point I would convert them to > > Test::More. > > There's no "I want to add a new test to this test file that uses Test.pm and > it would be nice if I could use Test::Foo" case?
I also immetiately switched from Copy-n-Paste tests (all starting DBD authors do) to a full fletched Test::More, and used T::M for every test written from scratch thereafter. I never (knowingly) used Test.pm for my own tests. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.5, & 5.9.x, and 809 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, AIX 5.2, SuSE 9.1, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
