On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -0000, Simon Glover wrote: > > > +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values'); > > + new P0, .ResizableStringArray > > + set I0, 0 > > +L1: set S0, I0 > > + set P0[I0], S0 > > + inc I0 > > + lt I0, 100000, L1 > > ^this^ > > really really hurts.
Sorry about that - I converted the test from an existing one for ResizableFloatArray, but forgot that in the string case there's a much higher load on the GC system due to all the string headers. I see no reason why it shouldn't be smaller. Simon
