On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:23:17PM +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> ah! That makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying matters! :)
>
> Ok, then it seems we need to have a builtin, such that:
> new_builtin(0xE2) ~ new_builtin(0x82) ~ new_builtin(0xAC) eq
> "\xE2\x82\xAC"
Hmm. Looks like you've just found that built-in ;-)
"\xE2" ~ "\x82" ~ "\xAC"
Though if "chr" is a vowel-challenged version of "char", then surely
"byte" (or "bte" if you're insane :) should be the name of that new
built-in. If it's even to have a name. I'm perfectly happy with
interpolation if that's a way that works.
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
