Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:

:     foo('a' => 1) <== ('b' => 2, ...)

[ ... ]

Plus it settles the whole issue of what to do with multiple pipes into
the same function.  But I don't think Parrot has to worry about that,

Thanks. Again. I think, we should keep *parrot* calling conventions at a reasonable maintanable (and implementable) level, which is AFAIK around "usual" function calls, i.e. around the level of Python calling conventions.

Larry

my 2 ยข

leo

Reply via email to