On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Nov 23, 2005, at 19:08, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > >You keep confusing static and dynamic call information. > > Not confusing actually, maybe abusing the static sub structure by > adding a dynamic field 'ctx' - yes.
Point taken - the code may be confused, but that doesn't mean you are. :-) But that kind of abuse is just going to end in tears. > Chip: > > Subs don't have callers. > > Call frames have callers. > > And callframes aren't PMCs (because we don't have weak pointers) > therefore an introspection of :outer can only return the 'Sub' of outer > but not actually the real call frame aka the context ... > > The introspection $frame.get_lexpad (pdd20) can't be implemented w/o > that currently. Thanks for the reminder, I'd forgotten to put that IRC discussion into the doc. I just committed r10202, which includes: +For example, to get the immediate caller's LexPad, use: + + $P0 = getinterp + $P1 = $P0["lexpad"; 1] -- Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
