[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Lester) writes:
> This is cool!  Thanks for doing it.

My pleasure -- I am looking for a way to contribute.

> Can you rerun it without the files that are apparently intentionally
> dupes of each other?  For example, there's jit_cpu.c and exec_cpu.c, and
> apparently are exact clones of each other.

Certainly; but I have a question -- originating in my first view of cpd
results, those of httpd hosted at pmd.sourceforge.net -- are the dupes
that are 'waste' only the ones found in one file? Or, maybe better for
me, how do I discern what you discerned? (I wanna discern!!)

Reply via email to