While you're waiting, we should improve the test for readline: we
used to have similar failures where we found readline (or other
probed thingees) but the version was not recent enough for us to link
with.
Regards.
On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Jul 2, 2006, at 15:04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
But the -lreadline is needed for something later?
If readline is available, it can be used at interactive prompts, but
it's not absolutely needed.
I think I will first try to get the admins to get compile a newer
libreadline.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
