Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And, I do think making the PASM and PIR compilers capable of being used
as standard compiler objects is a superior solution.
We currently can't pass any arguments to PASM/PIR compilers. You can't change
trace or debug options for "eval". This is a serious limitation, which needs
a flexible solution e.g. passing named args. Some syntactic sugar opcode
syntax, which first has to be parsed as opcode, then be converted to a method
call does really not help here - sorry.
Hrm... I think you missed my point, which was that enabling method-call
syntax on the PASM/PIR compilers was a better solution than pushing
consistency via opcode syntax.
We're in violent agreement again. :)
Allison
