On Sun Sep 16 03:50:48 2007, kjs wrote: > On Thu Sep 13 19:19:14 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) wrote: > > > > > > Therefore, in order to keep IMCC simple and remove syntax redundancy, I > > > propose to remove the ".pcc_sub" directive from IMCC. > > > > Agreed. If there are any remaining differences, they're implementation > > artifacts and should be merged. > > > > Allison > > > > > attached a patch removing the .pcc_sub directive in PIR mode. Note that > it is still allowed in PASM mode. > > the 2nd patch changes the test and other files that used the pcc_sub > directive. I sent this patch to the list as well, but for sake of > completeness included it here too. > > regards, > kjs
forgot to CC list; here it is!
