On 9/18/07, Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Sep 12 08:28:27 2007, kjs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > From:
> > http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/pdd/pdd06_pasm.html
> >
> > The following flags are available: :main to indicate that execution should
> > start at the specified subroutine; :immediate or :postcomp to indicate
> that
> > the sub should be run immediately after compilation; :load to indicate
> that
> > the sub should be executed when its bytecode segment is loaded; :init to
> > indicate the sub should be run when the file is run directly.
> >
> >
> > THere are two flags, ":immediate" and ":postcomp" that have the same
> > behaviour.
> > IMO, it'd be nice to remove such redundancies from IMCC.
> >
> > My proposal is to remove either :immediate or :postcomp. I'd vote for
> > keeping :immediate, thus removing :postcomp.
> >
> > regards,
> > kjs
>
> As long as :postcomp has no meaning aside from what :immediate provides,
> I agree, it should be removed.
>
yep, :postcomp and :immediate are the same, let's settle on :immediate
and remove :postcomp.
~jerry
