The issues that this thread was discussing appear to have been resolved, but the most recent posting was a request for the development of a PDD.
Allison, Bob: Is this going to happen? If so, I think we should track it in a separate RT so that we close this one. If not, then I will close this ticket after this week's release. Thank you very much. kid51 On Thu Aug 03 11:59:01 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bob Rogers wrote: > > > > There's no way to get full Continuations working around such C > code barriers, > > except by *not* entering secondary runloops at all for these > cases[1]. This > > could be achieved by (optionally) returning a new PC for all > vtable/MMD > > functions that is, by changing the internal (C) calling > conventions of all > > the PMC code. > > > > I see a solution for simpler cases, that might even work for custom > sort > > functions, though it's certainly not painless. Here's what I would > like > > to do for calling actions: > > Bob, could you briefly write up the problem and proposed solution as a > [PDD] ticket for the extending, embedding, and external C API PDDs > (10-12, and possibly 2 and 23)? How we handle exceptions and > control-flow across C/Parrot boundaries is an important question, and > I > want to make sure we address it. > > Thanks, > Allison >
