Andrew - thanks for looking at this and while I haven't read your patch....
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:38 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - I'm not sure how accurate or useful the discussion of formal roles is. >> For >> example, we seem to be doing fine without a pumpking, and this is the only >> place I've ever heard the term "platform porter" >> > for the canonical list of parrot roles and responsibilities, see > docs/project/roles_responsibilities.pod. > > you'll find platform porter listed there. listed as well is pumpking, > which should be removed. > > i suggest the chapter text and the text in that file should be kept > very close in line, if not identical. ... I had to comment on this while it was fresh in my mind: DRY. Let's pick a spot and maintain it once, if maintain it we must. We can always link back and forth. > ~jerry > > -- Will "Coke" Coleda
