On Aug 5, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
[SVK 2.2]
Sounds spiffy. So these branch commands actually create branches on the svn repository that's doing the hosting, so they're defacto shared with the community in the obvious location? (presuming you're online and pushing changes back?)
Correct.
That seems to be the best of both worlds, presuming it handles the merging better/faster/cleaner than 'svn merge' does.
So long as everyone doing the merges for a given set of branches uses svk, then it can keep track of what's going on and make your life easy.
And, of course, we want to know if it's not making your life easier, so we can improve things.
-j
-- Will "Coke" Coleda
