On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Christoph Otto via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri Jun 27 13:14:53 2008, coke wrote:
> >>
> >> While I think this particular example is now valid with the new calling
> >> conventions, you can get a similar effect with:
> >>
> >> METHOD BORK BORK parent() {
> >> /* nothing to see here*/
> >> }
> >
> > This ticket doesn't seem to be closeable as is.Would it be good enough
> > if pmc2c.pl spit out an error on the above definition, or is this even
> > something that pmc2c.pl should be concerned about?
> >
>
> The goal of the ticket should be for pmc2c.pl to entirely parse the
> input PMC files. Either passing through uncooked C, or doing
> transformations. Silently dropping code on the floor is not
> acceptable.
wouldn't a PGE-based compiler be helpful?
just a thought.
kjs
