Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
...This section of code would be much simpler (and more efficient) by using the C<find_cclass> and C<find_not_cclass opcodes> instead of individually examining each character one-at-a-time.+.sub 'chop' :method + len = length tmps + if len == 0 goto done + dec len + substr tmps,tmps, 0, len ...PIR has a C<chop> opcode, perhaps we should use it?
Definitely. But I just moved code around. Should I add TODO ticket for cleaning up this code?
-- Bacek
