<ruoso> $.a.() is equivalent to $.a().()
<ruoso> which is equivalent to $.a()()
<masak> ruoso: ok.
<masak> I buy that.
<masak> I just don't see why .() and () aren't equivalent in this
particular case.
<ruoso> they are
<ruoso> but you're missing that $.a is a method call
<ruoso> not a variable
<masak> ah.
<ruoso> so, the full version of $.a is $.a()
* masak sees now
<ruoso> then $.a()() and $.a().() are the same
<masak> ruoso: thank you for your patience with me.
<ruoso> masak, so, for the rakudobug
<ruoso> "rakudo is making an exception in the parse of $.a when the
class defines "has $.a""
<ruoso> and it shouldn't
<masak> thanks. :)
<masak> pasted.
