chromatic wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 23:55:28 Moritz Lenz wrote: > >> I think abusing a class as a role is forbidden > > I hope it's not!
Well, it surely depends on context. You can "pun" a role into a class by instantiating it, but the correct way to apply it to another class seems to be with 'does', not 'is'. I haven't found a concrete reference in the specs if it's actually forbidden, a comment from jnthn or TimToady would be appreciated. Cheers, Moritz
