# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #69216]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=69216 >
<ruoso> rakudo: my $a = Multi.new; $a.push(sub (1,2,3) { });
$a.push(sub (1,2) { }); say join ", ", $a.candidates
<p6eval> rakudo a969c9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in type() [...]
<jnthn> Hmm.
<jnthn> rakudo: my $a = Multi.new; $a.push(sub (1,2,3) { });
$a.push(sub (1,2) { }); say $a.candidates.perl
<p6eval> rakudo a969c9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
<jnthn> rakudo: my $a = Multi.new; $a.push(sub (1,2,3) { });
$a.push(sub (1,2) { }); say $a.candidates
<p6eval> rakudo a969c9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in type() [...]
<ruoso> rakudo: my $a = Multi.new; $a.push(sub (1,2,3) { });
$a.push(sub (1,2) { }); say "Alive"
<p6eval> rakudo a969c9: OUTPUT«Alive»
<masak> jnthn: rakudobug?
<jnthn> masak: npmca always is
<masak> :)
* masak goes through the motions
<jnthn> Feel free to submit; I'd like to try and get some "official"
introspection interface agreed on for multis though.
<jnthn> Then we can have spectests.
<masak> \o/
<jnthn> And then it's more worthwhile fixing it (because we'll then be
sure not to break it again...)
<ruoso> I think .candidates is consusus
<jnthn> ruoso: consensus?
<ruoso> jnthn, I mean, having $multi.candidates as spec is "general agreement"
<ruoso> consensus in portuguese only means that
<jnthn> ruoso: OK, then we're agreeing. :-)
