On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Patrick R. Michaud via RT <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > Whenever there seem to be odd type inconsistencies, it's often useful to > put .PARROT on the results instead of .WHAT, just to see what types the > underlying objects *really* are. > > (Rakudo does a few tricks here and there to make Parrot types act like > Perl 6 types, but sometimes the illusion isn't perfect.)
Right, and I'm pretty sure I remember you showing me that back when you fixed this bug two weeks ago. :) Did you see the conversation I had with Moritz on the the similar Complex problem on #perl6 yesterday? No rush whatsoever, I think your PGE stuff is more important, and besides, I could use a few days where working on Rakudo trig functions isn't stealing time from my $work. (Rakudo is much more -Ofun than my $work is at the moment.) -- Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
