On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Larry Wall <la...@wall.org> wrote: > But I also think that type recursion is likelier to indicate a design > error than function recursion, so I'm not sure how far down this road > we want to go. We could, for instance, create a new type name every
I was going to say "I use self-referential and cyclical type definitions in Sprixel's (stage0) C# source..." (because I did at one point), but then I realized I stopped doing that; it worked, but it was a tad too tricksy to maintain. So, point taken.
