On Tue Jul 27 18:42:29 2010, coke wrote: > On Tue Jun 16 08:57:58 2009, masak wrote: > > <masak> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c > > <p6eval> rakudo ba09b2: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in getprop() [...] > > * masak submits rakudobug > > <pmichaud> masak: ::c is lexically scoped. > > <masak> pmichaud: meaning it can't be seen? > > <pmichaud> outside of the block, no. > > <masak> still, a Null PMC access is never right. > > <pmichaud> true. > > 21:42 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c > 21:42 <+p6eval> rakudo 7f5c22: OUTPUT«Cannot modify readonly value in > '&infix:<=>' at line 1 in main program body at line > 22:/tmp/xfWzETH8wO» >
Changed again: 19:35 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c 19:35 <+p6eval> rakudo 38907e: OUTPUT«Cannot assign to a non-container in <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in block <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1» Is this now closable? -- Will "Coke" Coleda