If you ask me, the essense of the ticket -- the Null PMC access -- has
been fixed already.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Will Coleda via RT
<perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> On Sat Jul 24 14:09:01 2010, coke wrote:
>> On Fri Apr 02 04:47:19 2010, masak wrote:
>> > <masak> rakudo: 0 but last
>> > <p6eval> rakudo 63ff06: OUTPUT«Warning␤Null PMC access in can()
> [...]
>> > * masak submits rakudobug
>>
>> This now behaves just like 'last':
>>
>> $ ./perl6
>> > last
>> $ ./perl6
>> > 0 but last
>> $
>
> This is now different again, but still [WEIRD].
>
> 15:37 < [Coke]> nom: 0 but last;
> 15:37 <+p6eval> nom ce15be: OUTPUT«Warning␤»
> 15:37 < [Coke]> ... what warning?
> 15:37 < [Coke]> ah. no warning. weird.
> 15:37 < [Coke]> nom: last;
> 15:37 <+p6eval> nom ce15be: OUTPUT«Warning␤»
>
> There really is no text after the literal "Warning" message.
>
> --
> Will "Coke" Coleda
>

Reply via email to