If you ask me, the essense of the ticket -- the Null PMC access -- has been fixed already.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Will Coleda via RT <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sat Jul 24 14:09:01 2010, coke wrote: >> On Fri Apr 02 04:47:19 2010, masak wrote: >> > <masak> rakudo: 0 but last >> > <p6eval> rakudo 63ff06: OUTPUT«WarningNull PMC access in can() > [...] >> > * masak submits rakudobug >> >> This now behaves just like 'last': >> >> $ ./perl6 >> > last >> $ ./perl6 >> > 0 but last >> $ > > This is now different again, but still [WEIRD]. > > 15:37 < [Coke]> nom: 0 but last; > 15:37 <+p6eval> nom ce15be: OUTPUT«Warning» > 15:37 < [Coke]> ... what warning? > 15:37 < [Coke]> ah. no warning. weird. > 15:37 < [Coke]> nom: last; > 15:37 <+p6eval> nom ce15be: OUTPUT«Warning» > > There really is no text after the literal "Warning" message. > > -- > Will "Coke" Coleda >