On Tue Dec 21 01:10:35 2010, masak wrote: > <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {}; class A {} > <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Parent isn't a Class.» > * masak submits LTA rakudobug > * masak wonders idly what the parent is > <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; say A.WHAT > <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«Failure()» > <masak> ah. > <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {} > <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Null PMC access in can()» > <masak> huh. > <masak> that's the first causality-defying Null PMC access. :)
This seems fine now: 09:18 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {}; class A {} #RT #81060 09:18 <+p6eval> rakudo ce5cca: ( no output ) 09:18 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { ... }; say A.WHAT #RT 81060 09:18 <+p6eval> rakudo ce5cca: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===The following packages were stubbed but not defined: A» Closable with tests. -- Will "Coke" Coleda