On Wed May 29 19:36:59 2013, coke wrote: > On Sat Nov 17 15:36:41 2012, coke wrote: > > On Sun May 06 09:53:31 2012, masak wrote: > > > <moritz> r: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9) > > > <p6eval> rakudo d9fd17: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for > > > parameter > > > '$nu'; expected Int but got Num instead in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS at > > > src/gen/CORE.setting [...] > > > <colomon> that's a legit rakudo bug > > > <moritz> aye > > > * moritz leaves it to masak++ > > > * masak submits it > > > > This no longer errors, but seems to be doing... a lot of somethings. > > > > ... Now what? > > Erroring again: > > 22:36 < [Coke]> r: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9) > 22:36 <+camelia> rakudo 8a0859: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for > parameter > 'nu'; expected Int but got Num instead in sub > DIVIDE_NUMBERS > at src/gen/CORE.setting:7990 in sub infix:<**> at > src/gen/CORE.setting:8131 in sub infix:<**> at > src/gen/CORE.setting:3020 in block at > /tmp/GbNF6TmPgz:1»…
This is back to hanging again, which I think is the "correct" behavior - how to test this? put it in a timer so that if doesn't error in 5s, we kill it and call it good? -- Will "Coke" Coleda