Yeah, I'm not sure either. // Carl
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jonathan Scott Duff via RT <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sun Feb 26 09:00:11 2012, masak wrote: >> <gfldex> there are a few things missing in Temporal, though >> <gfldex> like Date.new(now); >> <gfldex> you have to do Date.new(DateTime.now) >> <masak> how about Date.today? >> <masak> if it's missing, that's an omission :) >> <masak> yeah, I want Date.today. that makes perfect sense. >> <masak> nom: say Date.today >> <p6eval> nom 9d39e8: OUTPUT«2012-02-26» >> <masak> oh! there it is! :) >> <masak> we could add Date.now as a synonym, but that feels only half- >> important. >> <gfldex> nom: say Date.new(now); >> <p6eval> nom 9d39e8: OUTPUT«Default constructor only takes named >> arguments [...] >> <masak> nom: say Date(now) >> <p6eval> nom 9d39e8: OUTPUT«Method 'Date' not found for invocant of >> class 'Instant' [...] >> <masak> arguably that should work. >> * masak submits rakudobug >> <jnthn> masak: You implement method postcircumfix:<( )> in Date. >> <masak> ooh >> <jnthn> I'm pretty sure I already wired up that case :) > > See > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/b86a152cc175171a4bd89e789c58ff7c7f5f62b6 > > Not sure we should have a postcircumfix on Date when we can easily get what > we want from .new() > > -Scott
