FROGGS explained on #perl6 why the empty BagHash is correct: < FROGGS> bartolin: the bare a will result in a named argument, where the quoted "a" will construct a pair and pass that < FROGGS> bartolin: and methods (like .new in this case) happily eat named (optional by default) arguments, which is to spec < bartolin> FROGGS: thanks for explaining < bartolin> FROGGS: do you think we need a test for that case (a happily eaten named argument)? I tend to close the ticket without a further test (but with adding this explanation) < FROGGS> bartolin: yes, this behaviour (aka "interface consistency") shall be tested
I'll add a second test to S02-types/baghash.t and close this ticket afterwards.
