This is in discussion right now, and since the recent pipe() addition, we have another bit implemented to actually make your proposal work.
Though, we've not yet decided where we want to go, how one opens such a pipe or captures stdout/err, or does redirections of said handles... I hope we can say more in a few weeks. Am 02.01.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Gabor Szabo: > I see there are 'run' and 'shell' functions that return the exit > status in Proc::Status, and QX that returns the output. Wouldn't it be > better to have a function the returns and object that contains both > the status, the stdout and the stderr? > > e.g. extending Proc::Status to be able to hold those as well and > changing QX to return > that object? > > Gabor >
