jnthn fixed this with f435959e8b4a1ec72c98bc , tests needed afaik
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 22:44, Carl Mäsak (via RT) <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org>
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
> # Please include the string: [perl #126089]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126089 >
>
>
> <masak> so what does `done` actually do outside of a `supply` block?
> <jnthn> masak: Nothing, just as "last" doesn't do anything outside of a loop
> <PerlJam> masak: throws a CONTROL_DONE
> <masak> m: last
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 643eb6: OUTPUT«last without loop construct [...]
> <jnthn> Well, yeah, it whines you used it in the wrong place
> <masak> jnthn: at least it warns.
> <masak> `done` does nothing.
> <jnthn> m: done
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 643eb6: ( no output )
> <jnthn> Hm
> <jnthn> m: emit 1;
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 643eb6: ( no output )
> <jnthn> Wonder why that gets dropped
> <jnthn> It *is* throwing a control exception
> <masak> anyway, it seems you agree with me it should do something ;)
> <jnthn> Aye
> * masak submits rakudobug
